Home / Keynotes / London and the UK
Based in London · speaking worldwideRahim Hirji is a London-based author and keynote speaker on AI, work and human judgement. He argues that AI comes for your judgement before it comes for your job, and that most organisations are handing theirs over without ever deciding to.
Rahim Hirji founded the skills platform EtonX, later acquired by Eton College, and led Quizlet’s international growth across more than 60 countries.
Watch the showreel · 2 minutes
A feel for the room before you put me in front of yours.
SuperSkills is endorsed by Karim Lakhani (Harvard Business School), Alnoor Bhimani (London School of Economics), David Rowan (founding editor, WIRED UK), Sherry Coutu CBE and ten others. Rahim has spoken to leadership teams at Google, Barclays, Kaplan, BPP University and Next 15. Published by Kogan Page, part of Hachette UK.
What organisers say
“I brought Rahim in to speak to the Luminary Community, a group of female leaders and high potentials working in HR and people. I wanted something that would make sense of AI for them without the hype and without the fear. Rahim started with the human rather than the technology, and that reframing was the thing. He made AI feel simple and made us feel capable, which is not a combination I have come across before. Our members left with something they could actually use.”
“We brought Rahim in to help our EMEA People Operations leadership team think through AI and human judgement. He surveyed us beforehand, sixteen of eighteen answered, and he built the session from our own responses, so the whole morning was about us. I’d recommend him to any leadership team working out what should stay human.”
On the book
“In proposing 'superskills' for the new era of AI, Hirji outlines what is essential to navigate the most intense technological disruption humanity has yet had to face.”
Rahim Hirji is the author of SuperSkills: The Seven Human Skills for the Age of AI, published by Kogan Page in 2026, and the founder of The SuperSkills Intelligence Company. He is based in London and speaks worldwide.
He spent twenty years building education technology before he wrote about it. He founded EtonX, the online learning venture of Eton College, starting the business in China and partnering with schools in Shanghai and across the country. He led Quizlet's international expansion across sixty countries. Earlier in his career he worked for the government of Abu Dhabi. That background matters to what he argues: he has spent his working life on how people actually acquire capability, which turns out to be the thing AI interferes with.
The argument rests on research across more than 200 organisations in 30 countries since 2019, published openly and in full at this research, where every source is graded and the open questions stay visible. He has written weekly on technology and human capability since January 2017, five years before ChatGPT, in Box of Amazing.
AI rarely takes a whole job. It takes the first draft, the initial analysis, the routine review. Those were also the tasks through which people built the judgement that made them senior. The work still ships, the output often improves, and nothing triggers an alarm.
So the question for a leadership team is not whether to adopt AI. It is whether the organisation is drifting into it through a thousand small reasonable decisions nobody quite made, or designing it by deciding in advance where human judgement has to remain. Drift asks nothing of you. That is what makes it the default.
The evidence is more interesting than either the hype or the doom. Across 106 experiments, human and AI combinations performed worse on average than the better of human alone or AI alone, with the losses concentrated in decision-making. Clinicians whose unassisted detection rate fell after AI exposure. Students whose grades rose 48 per cent with an AI tutor and fell 17 per cent below a control group once it was removed. None of that says do not use AI. It says the design of the relationship decides the outcome.
One argument, sharpened for the room. Forty to ninety minutes, in person or online, tailored after a briefing call.
The signature keynote. Shows a leadership team which mode it is running, then hands it the controls. Boards, executive teams and senior leadership offsites. The room leaves able to read the drift versus design matrix against its own organisation, and to see where AI sharpens judgement and where it weakens it.
The suit amplifies. The human decides. The seven human skills that grow more valuable as the tools spread, carried by a family story across four generations and three continents. For whole organisations, cross-sector conferences and education. They arrive thinking AI is the story and leave knowing they are.
A live judgement test for boards, run in the room. December to March only.
Full descriptions, audiences and outcomes are at keynotes.
Right for boards and non-executive directors, executive committees, leadership offsites, HR and CHRO conferences, professional bodies, and cross-sector conferences wanting a substantive argument rather than a tools demonstration.
Wrong for an AI tools demonstration, a vendor showcase, a technical AI briefing, or a session that needs an optimistic message with the difficult part removed. If that is the brief, the guide to choosing an AI keynote speaker names four other kinds of speaker and when to pick each.
London is home, so a UK booking carries no travel cost and short notice is easier to accommodate. He has spoken at the CIPD Festival of Work, at London Tech Week, at Echo360’s EMEA retreat, at Imperial, and at the Shape the Future Consortium Summer Forum, hosted at Korn Ferry’s London offices in June 2026, among others, and has appeared on the BBC.
Also speaking nearby: Paris · Amsterdam · Europe · Dubai.



A UK audience also gets the UK position, which moves faster than most decks acknowledge. The AI Opportunities Action Plan of January 2025 remains the plan of record, but the current position is the One Year On update of 29 January 2026. The AI Safety Institute became the AI Security Institute in February 2025. DSIT is being dissolved and AI strategy has moved to the Cabinet Office, with Kanishka Narayan MP appointed Minister of State for AI in July 2026. And the Information Commissioner reported in March 2026 that many employers are likely relying on solely automated decisions in recruitment without meaningful human involvement, which engages Article 22 of the UK GDPR.
That last one is the argument in miniature: an oversight step that exists on paper and not in practice. It is examined at human in the loop is not a safeguard.
London has more bookable conference space than anywhere else in Europe and almost none of it is interchangeable. The room decides what version of a keynote is possible before a word of it is written, so this is the ladder rather than a list of the largest.
Districts, and what each one signals. The City is financial services, insurance and professional services, and Sancroft is its only real plenary; everything else there is a dinner room or a mid-size floor. The financial services and professional services pages carry the sector material behind a City booking. Westminster is government relations, regulators and trade bodies, and it is also the district most exposed to the parliamentary calendar below. King's Cross is AI, developer and scale-up audiences. The West End is prestige, awards and board-level international. The Royal Docks is volume: exhibition-led and trade-audience, and the Elizabeth line changed what a day trip there costs in delegate time. Canary Wharf is the interesting absence, because almost all of its capacity is in-building corporate space rather than open-market hire, so a Wharf audience is usually hosted by one of its own firms.
The London calendar, and one window that behaves like a closed season. Parliament publishes a named recess called Conference: in 2026 the Commons rose on 15 September and returned on 12 October. Five party conferences run back to back inside it. That removes not only ministers but the entire public-affairs, trade-association and communications ecosystem from London for roughly a month, and it is officially published rather than a matter of custom, which makes it the closest thing London has to the Gulf's Ramadan constraint.
The 2027 spring is unusually compressed. Easter falls 26 to 29 March and runs into the school holiday, then the early May bank holiday on the 3rd and the spring one on the 31st, with Whitsun half-term 31 May to 4 June. The genuinely usable windows are roughly 12 to 23 April and 4 to 28 May. Inside that, note that the 2027 London Marathon is a two-day event, Saturday 24 and Sunday 25 April, 100,000 participants across both days, which takes a full long weekend of central hotel inventory, road access and staff availability.
Recurring fixtures, from organisers' own pages: London Tech Week 7 to 11 June 2027 at Olympia; Infosecurity Europe 8 to 10 June 2027 at ExCeL; the CBI Annual Conference on 23 November 2026 at the QEII Centre; HR Technologies UK 5 to 6 May 2027 and the CIPD Festival of Work 9 to 10 June 2027, both at ExCeL, the Festival having moved there from Olympia; Big Data LDN 23 to 24 September 2026 at Olympia.
Two corrections worth having before a plan is built. CogX has folded. The organiser states that the economics of large-scale events no longer worked and that the festival was wound down in 2025, yet third parties are still advertising a CogX Summit the organiser does not publish. And Money20/20 Europe is not a London event: it runs at the RAI in Amsterdam.
One thing said plainly rather than dressed up. The trade belief that August is dead and that December ballrooms are gone by June is convention, not measurement. No United Kingdom industry body publishes a month-by-month series for business-event or function-space demand. The only official monthly series that exists measures hotel bedrooms rather than ballrooms, and it partly contradicts the folklore: London ran fuller and dearer in September 2025 than in August. Where the honest answer is that nobody has measured it, that is the answer.
Keynotes run 30 to 90 minutes. Workshops and board sessions are longer and structured differently. Booking is usually three to six months ahead, though gaps do appear. Delivery is in English only, in person or online across time zones. Travel from London anywhere the brief justifies it.
A small number of pro bono slots are held each year for schools, charities and public-sector education.
Rahim Hirji is a London-based keynote speaker on AI, work and human judgement, and the author of SuperSkills: The Seven Human Skills for the Age of AI (Kogan Page, 2026). He argues that AI comes for judgement before it comes for jobs. He speaks for boards, executive teams, leadership offsites and HR and CHRO conferences, in London, across the UK and worldwide, in person and online. The research behind the talk is published in full: 537 graded studies drawn from work across more than 200 organisations in over 30 countries, each with what it does and does not prove.
Three keynotes, all versions of one argument. Drift versus Design, the signature talk, shows a leadership team whether it is drifting into AI through decisions nobody quite made or designing where human judgement has to remain. We Are Superheroes covers the seven human skills that grow more valuable as tools spread. WTH, What the Human, is a live judgement test for boards, run between December and March.
Keynotes run 30 to 90 minutes, in person or online, tailored after a briefing call. Booking is usually three to six months ahead, though gaps do appear. Workshops and board sessions are longer and structured differently. A small number of pro bono slots are held each year for schools, charities and public-sector education.
English only. He is based in London and travels from there, and delivers in English in person and online across time zones.
Anyone wanting an AI tools demonstration, a vendor showcase, a technical AI briefing, or an optimistic message with the difficult part removed. The argument is that most organisations are handing over judgement without deciding to, which is not a comfortable message. His guide to choosing an AI keynote speaker names four other kinds of speaker and when to pick each.
Three to six months ahead for an in-person date, though gaps do appear. Shorter is often possible for a virtual session, and sometimes in person where the diary is free and the talk already exists in the form you need. Ask earlier rather than later. There is one of him, he carries advisory clients and other commitments alongside the speaking, so not every date can be taken.
Most conference keynotes come in around £10,000. What moves it: the time I commit, travel, how full the diary is that month, and how far the talk is built for your room. Indicative bands are set out at what an AI keynote speaker costs, and the enquiry form asks for a budget band. Tell us the room, the date, the audience and what you need them to do differently, and you will get a number quickly. Schools, universities and charities are quoted differently. A London booking carries no travel, no accommodation and no expenses at all. Outside London you book the transport and you pay it, because your rates are better than his and nobody is out of pocket waiting on a reimbursement.
A technology scale-up changing AI tools faster than the organisation could absorb, with the technical teams moving and everyone else adopting nothing and frightened of it. Delivered at short notice from the head office in central London to about 1,500 people dialling in, and it became executive coaching and support for the transformation lead.
Scope. Nothing was measured before or after, and the account of what shifted comes from the people who commissioned it.
Seven case studies, each one saying what it does not show.
We brought Rahim in to speak to our teams in the Corporate Bank about what AI actually changes for the people doing the work. He handled a demanding room and left them with something they could act on rather than only something to think about.Stuart FosterHead of Coverage, UK Corporate Banking, Barclays
A reply within 24 hours, and a straight answer on fit even when the answer is somebody else.
Not every brief is a talk. A board that needs to settle which decisions a machine may make wants a board briefing, a review or a standing advisor, and the five formats are set out side by side with what each one is for.
No enquiry today, or not yet the right time? The weekly letter is the low-commitment version of the same argument. Every week, an essay and ten links to broaden your view of the world. Read by 25,000 people, every week since 2017. Free, and one click to stop.
Opens Substack to confirm. No pitch in it, unsubscribe in one click, and nobody follows up because you read something.