Home / Keynotes / Asia and Asia-Pacific / Seoul
Available in Seoul and across KoreaKorea put both halves of the question side by side, and the gap between them is the finding: 38.8 per cent of jobs technically automatable, 2.7 per cent of firms actually adopting. Almost every number in this field measures the first and gets discussed as though it described the second.
Rahim Hirji is available for in-person AI keynotes in Seoul, South Korea, and for online sessions worldwide. He is a London-based keynote speaker specialising in AI and human judgement, and the author of SuperSkills (Kogan Page, 2026). He founded the skills platform EtonX, later acquired by Eton College, and led Quizlet’s international growth across more than 60 countries.
Korea Development Institute, 800-firm surveyRead at the issuing body’s own page, and quoted in full below.
Watch the showreel · 2 minutes
A feel for the room before you put me in front of yours.
SuperSkills is endorsed by Karim Lakhani (Harvard Business School), Alnoor Bhimani (London School of Economics), David Rowan (founding editor, WIRED UK), Sherry Coutu CBE and ten others. Rahim has spoken to leadership teams at Google, Barclays, Kaplan, BPP University and Next 15. Published by Kogan Page, part of Hachette UK.
What organisers say
“A standout highlight was an inspiring session with Rahim Hirji exploring SuperSkills and Human Judgement. As AI transforms daily workflows, the real differentiator isn't just algorithmic speed, it is intentional human design, critical judgement, empathy, and ethical stewardship. Technology accelerates the how, but human judgement defines the why.”
“I can honestly say it was the best session we have had so far and we have had some amazing sessions.”
On the book
“Rahim Hirji has written something as rare as it is welcome: a guide to the AI age grounded not in futurism or hype, but in wisdom and humanity.”
Every keynote is tailored after a briefing call, and the larger engagements start before the day rather than on it: a diagnostic of the client's own people, so the room hears its own evidence rather than somebody else's. What the room leaves with is written down.
What that has looked like: a survey of fifty of a client's own people run BEFORE the session, to find where judgement had already been handed to tools they had built themselves, read back to the executive team in their own words, then a workshop in which they named four or five of their own processes and rebuilt them; and a division of a very large company permitted exactly one AI tool, which after the constraint was examined moved to a multi-tool sandbox with different functions choosing different models, then repeated across further divisions.
Six of the seven engagements published on this site produced further work after the session rather than at it. The seven are set out in full at case studies, each with a line saying what it does not show.
How to read these examples. They are published to show how the work is put together, not as a client list for Seoul. Most engagements are covered by confidentiality and are described without naming anyone; where a client is named anywhere on this site, it is with their agreement.
The Korea Development Institute scored 38.8 per cent of Korean jobs as technically automatable across more than 70 per cent of their tasks. Its survey of 800 firms with ten or more staff found actual adoption at 2.7 per cent.
Those are not competing estimates. They measure different things: what a technology could in principle do, and what organisations have in practice done. Almost every widely circulated figure in this field is the first kind, and almost every boardroom conversation treats it as the second. A Korean audience has its own national institute's work to make the point with.

The realised effects are the ones worth carrying into a board meeting: no aggregate employment change, lower earnings, and the impact concentrated on younger, tertiary-educated workers and on women.
France's national statistics office found the same shape independently, with employment of 15 to 29 year olds excluding apprentices down 7.4 per cent year on year in IT services. Two countries, two methods, one silhouette, and it runs opposite to what twenty years of automation commentary trained everyone to expect. The story was never mass unemployment. It was the quiet removal of the first rung.
That is the mechanism at the missing rungs, and the debt it accrues is at capability debt.
AI rarely takes a whole job. It takes the first draft, the initial analysis, the routine review. Those were also the tasks through which people built the judgement that made them senior. The work still ships, the output often improves, and nothing triggers an alarm.
The question for a leadership team is therefore about mode rather than adoption. Is the organisation drifting into AI through a thousand small reasonable decisions nobody quite made, or designing it by deciding in advance where human judgement has to remain? Drift asks nothing of you. That is what makes it the default.
Boards, executive committees, conglomerate leadership, and corporate and association conferences in Seoul and across Korea. Delivery is in English only. Simultaneous interpretation is arranged by the host where required, and the session is structured to work with it. Rahim travels from London, and where travel is not practical the same session is delivered online. He can travel to the region or deliver virtually across all time zones.
Three keynotes, all versions of one argument. Drift versus Design is the signature talk for boards and executive teams. We Are Superheroes covers the seven human skills that grow more valuable as the tools spread. WTH, What the Human is a live judgement test for boards, run in the room, December to March only. Full descriptions are at keynotes.
A Korean-language summary of this argument is at the Korean page, published in Korean because the reader reads Korean, not because the keynote is delivered in it.
The KDI survey of 800 firms found 38.8 per cent of jobs technically automatable and 2.7 per cent of firms adopting. That gap gives Korean organisations room to design before habits set. I was GM International at Quizlet, a US company with users all over the world. In Seoul I work with you on which decisions to shape now, and your team comes out with that list agreed and owned. I deliver in English.
Rahim advises executive teams and writes Box of Amazing, a free weekly letter he has kept up since 2017. Keynotes · Advisory · Box of Amazing
Keynotes run 30 to 90 minutes, in person or virtual. A 30-minute main-stage version of each talk is available for conferences, and the full talk runs 45 to 60 minutes. The sector examples change for the room; the argument does not. All three, with the showreel, are at keynotes, and the programme copy is at the speaker pack.
Drift versus Design is built from your room. Your audience answers five anonymous questions beforehand, their answers shape the talk, and afterwards you get a one-page readout with the three decisions to look at first.
Also speaking nearby: Tokyo · Shanghai · Hong Kong.
Drift versus Design: why most organisations hand their judgement to AI without deciding to, and how to design your way through instead.
The Korea Development Institute found 38.8 per cent of jobs technically automatable and 2.7 per cent of firms adopting. Seoul executive teams decide now what should fill that gap.
We Are Superheroes: AI is the suit. The human decides.
Change Readiness, made concrete for conferences and universities in Seoul: what to keep learning when the tools move faster than the curriculum.
WTH (What the Human): a live test of a board's own judgement.
Korean boards may see that adoption gap close quickly. A working session now, while the numbers are small, means the first big AI decision is taken on purpose.
Two geography flags. KINTEX is in Goyang and Pangyo is in Seongnam, both in Gyeonggi rather than Seoul, so a delegate flown into Incheon for a Seoul event and sent to either will notice, and your Seoul room block stops making sense.
Korea gazettes its two lunar festivals annually and each is a legislated three-day block with a substitute-holiday mechanism. In 2026 the issuing body puts Seollal at 14 to 18 February and Chuseok at 24 to 27 September, with 70 public holidays in the year.
The practical stand-down is wider than the gazetted days, and this is convention rather than law: bridging leave either side, and a travel crush that makes the adjacent days unusable for anything needing national attendance. Korean firms conventionally avoid the fortnight straddling either festival. There is also a real mechanism for temporary holidays declared at a few weeks’ notice to bridge awkward gaps, which cannot be planned around, so build on the gazetted dates and accept a day may be added late.
Recurring fixtures at COEX include the Korea Electronics Show, 13 to 16 October 2026, and Smart Life Week, 6 to 8 October 2026, hosted by the metropolitan government. Seoul Fintech Week runs 26 to 28 October 2026 at Conrad Yeouido, and the choice of Yeouido over Gangnam is itself the signal: securities and the National Assembly on one island.
Rahim Hirji speaks in Seoul in English on AI, work and human judgement. He is the author of SuperSkills (Kogan Page, 2026) and founded EtonX, the online learning venture of Eton College. His Korea material comes from the Korea Development Institute rather than from vendor research. Simultaneous interpretation is arranged by the host where required. The research behind the talk is published in full: 537 graded studies drawn from work across more than 200 organisations in over 30 countries, each with what it does and does not prove.
The Korea Development Institute's survey of 800 firms with ten or more staff found actual adoption at 2.7 per cent, against 38.8 per cent of Korean jobs scored as technically automatable across more than 70 per cent of their tasks. The two numbers measure different things, and the gap between them is the finding.
No aggregate employment change, lower earnings, and the impact concentrated on younger, tertiary-educated workers and on women. France's national statistics office found the same shape independently, which makes the pattern harder to dismiss as a single-country artefact.
Three to six months ahead for an in-person date in Seoul. Shorter is often possible for a virtual session, and sometimes in person where the diary is free and the talk already exists in the form you need. Ask earlier rather than later. There is one of him, he carries advisory clients and other commitments alongside the speaking, so not every date can be taken.
Most conference keynotes come in around £10,000. What moves it: the time I commit, travel, how full the diary is that month, and how far the talk is built for your room. What moves the number is set out at what an AI keynote speaker costs. Tell us the room, the date, the audience and what you need them to do differently, and you will get a number within 24 hours. Schools, universities and charities are quoted differently. On travel there is one rule: outside London you book it and you pay it, because your rates are better than his and nobody is out of pocket waiting on a reimbursement. From London Heathrow to Seoul that means a business-class fare, arrival the night before, and normally two nights in a standard room at or near the venue. A London booking carries no travel, accommodation or expenses at all.
When the decision has already been made and the session exists to announce it. When the audience has no authority over their own work, because the talk asks them to decide which repetitions are worth keeping. When the slot runs under thirty minutes, because the turn needs setting up. And when the session follows a vendor pitch, since order matters more than programmes usually assume. Where the conditions are wrong we will say so, and sometimes that means reshaping the session. Occasionally it means recommending somebody else.
A note on the audience and the date is enough to begin; I reply with a draft outline.
Enquire or email rahim@thesuperskills.com
Part of speaking across Asia. See also Tokyo and Singapore. The parent page for all of this is AI keynote speaker. Browse every topic, audience and region, or take the speaker pack to whoever is running the day. Every engagement delivered so far, with the dates checkable at each organiser, is at the speaking record. AI 기조연설자 가이드(한국어).
Not every brief is a talk. A board that needs to settle which decisions a machine may make wants a board briefing, a review or a standing advisor, and the five formats are set out side by side with what each one is for.
No enquiry today, or not yet the right time? The weekly letter is the low-commitment version of the same argument. Every week, an essay and ten links to broaden your view of the world. Read by 25,000 people, every week since 2017. Free, and one click to stop.
Opens Substack to confirm. No pitch in it, unsubscribe in one click, and nobody follows up because you read something.
Running an event, or responsible for how AI arrives in your organisation? Keynotes · Advisory · Boards · Enquire