Home / Keynotes / Asia and Asia-Pacific / Hong Kong
Available in Hong KongHong Kong's statistical office measures augmented and virtual reality adoption at 1.5 per cent of firms. It does not ask about AI at all. Any Hong Kong AI adoption figure you have been shown came from somewhere else.
Rahim Hirji is available for in-person AI keynotes in Hong Kong, Asia-Pacific, and for online sessions worldwide. He is a London-based keynote speaker specialising in AI and human judgement, and the author of SuperSkills (Kogan Page, 2026). He founded the skills platform EtonX, later acquired by Eton College, and led Quizlet’s international growth across more than 60 countries.
Census and Statistics Department, 27 February 2026Read at the issuing body’s own page, and quoted in full below.
Watch the showreel · 2 minutes
A feel for the room before you put me in front of yours.
SuperSkills is endorsed by Karim Lakhani (Harvard Business School), Alnoor Bhimani (London School of Economics), David Rowan (founding editor, WIRED UK), Sherry Coutu CBE and ten others. Rahim has spoken to leadership teams at Google, Barclays, Kaplan, BPP University and Next 15. Published by Kogan Page, part of Hachette UK.
What organisers say
“We brought Rahim in to open our regional retreat in Istanbul with a keynote, in front of our ANZ leadership team, partner universities and priority recruitment agency partners. He went well beyond the brief, interviewing students and families directly so he could tell us what was happening on the ground rather than what we assumed from our own data. The keynote was a highlight of the event program, sparking conversation that carried on long after the session, and has an ongoing influence in our strategic thinking and forward planning.”
“We brought Rahim in to speak to our teams in the Corporate Bank about what AI actually changes for the people doing the work. He handled a demanding room and left them with something they could act on rather than only something to think about.”
On the book
“Even in an age of rapid technological advancement, the human role remains irreplaceable. This book shows how we can embrace change without fear and shape the future rather than have it happen to us.”
Every keynote is tailored after a briefing call, and the larger engagements start before the day rather than on it: a diagnostic of the client's own people, so the room hears its own evidence rather than somebody else's. What the room leaves with is written down.
What that has looked like: a survey of fifty of a client's own people run BEFORE the session, to find where judgement had already been handed to tools they had built themselves, read back to the executive team in their own words, then a workshop in which they named four or five of their own processes and rebuilt them; and a division of a very large company permitted exactly one AI tool, which after the constraint was examined moved to a multi-tool sandbox with different functions choosing different models, then repeated across further divisions.
Six of the seven engagements published on this site produced further work after the session rather than at it. The seven are set out in full at case studies, each with a line saying what it does not show.
How to read these examples. They are published to show how the work is put together, not as a client list for Hong Kong. Most engagements are covered by confidentiality and are described without naming anyone; where a client is named anywhere on this site, it is with their agreement.
The Census and Statistics Department's business survey of IT usage, released 27 February 2026, was read in full including all thirty tables. Artificial intelligence appears nowhere in it. The survey measures cloud computing at 98.1 per cent, QR codes at 37.6 per cent, RFID at 20.3 per cent, internet of things at 7.4 per cent, and augmented or virtual reality at 1.5 per cent.
Three companion publications, including the household IT survey and the flagship information society compendium, contain no AI content either. The consequence for anyone quoting a Hong Kong AI adoption figure is straightforward: it came from a private survey with a self-selected sample, and it should be introduced that way.
On strategy the position is similar. Hong Kong has published no consolidated territory-wide AI strategy. That is not an inference. The government was asked in the Legislative Council in October 2025 to map out strategies and set phased targets, and again in April 2026 to formulate a comprehensive AI development blueprint. Neither reply announced a document. The April 2026 answer was that initiatives are ongoing and being consolidated.

Hong Kong's privacy regulator is the exception. Its 2024 model framework requires that personnel exercising oversight remain aware of the tendency to over-rely on the output produced by AI, and states that human oversight should not be merely a gesture. That is a sharper formulation than most national frameworks manage.
Deskilling appears in none of the five Hong Kong instruments examined. The territory addresses whether the human starts competent, and whether they over-trust the machine in the moment. It does not address whether capability degrades through sustained use, which is the question at capability debt.
A market that is not measured is a market where every organisation is running its own uncontrolled experiment and comparing itself to numbers produced by vendors. The absence of an official figure is not a reason to relax. It is a reason to measure internally, because nobody else is going to do it for you.
The practical version of that is at how do you measure AI adoption properly, and the full Hong Kong account, document by document, is at AI and work in Asia.
Boards, financial and professional services, regional headquarters, chambers and association conferences. Delivery is in English. Keynotes run 30 to 90 minutes, with workshop and board-session formats. Rahim travels from London, and where travel is not practical the same session is delivered online. He can travel to the region or deliver virtually across all time zones.
Three keynotes, all versions of one argument. Drift versus Design is the signature talk for boards and executive teams. We Are Superheroes covers the seven human skills that grow more valuable as the tools spread. WTH, What the Human is a live judgement test for boards, run in the room, December to March only. Full descriptions are at keynotes.
A February 2026 Census and Statistics Department survey counts AR and VR at 1.5 per cent and skips AI entirely. Nobody official is going to measure this for a Hong Kong board. The HKMA and SFC have done more careful work, and they expect boards to keep up. I have addressed leadership at Barclays and advised companies across the UAE, Europe and the US. The session uses your numbers: your board leaves with one measure it can track each quarter, and the name of the person who owns it.
Hong Kong boards get Rahim's advisory experience across three regions and the habit of reading behind Box of Amazing, his free weekly letter. Keynotes · Advisory · Box of Amazing
Keynotes run 30 to 90 minutes, in person or virtual. A 30-minute main-stage version of each talk is available for conferences, and the full talk runs 45 to 60 minutes. The sector examples change for the room; the argument does not. All three, with the showreel, are at keynotes, and the programme copy is at the speaker pack.
Drift versus Design is built from your room. Your audience answers five anonymous questions beforehand, their answers shape the talk, and afterwards you get a one-page readout with the three decisions to look at first.
Also speaking nearby: Shanghai · Singapore · Seoul.
Drift versus Design: why most organisations hand their judgement to AI without deciding to, and how to design your way through instead.
Hong Kong's statistics office counts AR and VR adoption at 1.5 per cent and does not ask about AI. Executive teams learn to measure their drift when the official numbers stay silent.
We Are Superheroes: AI is the suit. The human decides.
Big Picture Thinking matters most where official statistics show only a sliver, such as that 1.5 per cent. Finance and education audiences in Hong Kong learn to see the whole system.
WTH (What the Human): a live test of a board's own judgement.
The HKMA and SFC have done more careful work on AI than government has. A board tests whether its judgement meets the standard its regulators already expect.
Art Basel Hong Kong runs 25 to 27 March 2027, the single largest compressor of the calendar. It takes the convention centre halls plus roughly a week of build and break either side, and five-star room nights across Central, Admiralty and Wan Chai, with satellite fairs and auction weeks stacked around it. Treat mid to late March 2027 as closed for an Island corporate conference, or move to AsiaWorld-Expo or Kai Tak where the contest is different.
The Observatory states in its own words that the tropical cyclone season is roughly June to October and that activity affecting the territory is most active July to September. That the city stops at Signal 8 is general practice, and no written cancellation or force-majeure clause was found on either major venue’s own site, so get one into the contract rather than relying on the norm.
One to leave off a plan. RISE is dormant: its own site carries no dates, no venue and no ticket sale, and its speakers section is headed past speakers. Listings claiming a July edition are quoting cached pages from before 2020.
Rahim Hirji speaks in Hong Kong in English on AI, work and human judgement. He is the author of SuperSkills (Kogan Page, 2026), he has presented in Hong Kong, and he founded EtonX starting the business in China. His Hong Kong material is drawn from the Census and Statistics Department and the privacy regulator rather than from private surveys. The research behind the talk is published in full: 537 graded studies drawn from work across more than 200 organisations in over 30 countries, each with what it does and does not prove.
There is no official figure. The Census and Statistics Department's business survey of IT usage of 27 February 2026 does not measure AI at all. It measures cloud computing at 98.1 per cent, QR codes at 37.6 per cent, RFID at 20.3 per cent, internet of things at 7.4 per cent and augmented or virtual reality at 1.5 per cent. Any Hong Kong AI adoption percentage in circulation comes from a private survey with a self-selected sample.
No consolidated territory-wide AI strategy has been published. The government was asked in the Legislative Council in October 2025 and again in April 2026, and neither reply announced a document. The April 2026 answer was that initiatives are ongoing and being consolidated. The operative overarching document remains a general innovation and technology blueprint from December 2022.
Three to six months ahead for an in-person date in Hong Kong. Shorter is often possible for a virtual session, and sometimes in person where the diary is free and the talk already exists in the form you need. Ask earlier rather than later. There is one of him, he carries advisory clients and other commitments alongside the speaking, so not every date can be taken.
Most conference keynotes come in around £10,000. What moves it: the time I commit, travel, how full the diary is that month, and how far the talk is built for your room. What moves the number is set out at what an AI keynote speaker costs. Tell us the room, the date, the audience and what you need them to do differently, and you will get a number within 24 hours. Schools, universities and charities are quoted differently. On travel there is one rule: outside London you book it and you pay it, because your rates are better than his and nobody is out of pocket waiting on a reimbursement. From London Heathrow to Hong Kong that means a business-class fare, arrival the night before, and normally two nights in a standard room at or near the venue. A London booking carries no travel, accommodation or expenses at all.
When the decision has already been made and the session exists to announce it. When the audience has no authority over their own work, because the talk asks them to decide which repetitions are worth keeping. When the slot runs under thirty minutes, because the turn needs setting up. And when the session follows a vendor pitch, since order matters more than programmes usually assume. Where the conditions are wrong we will say so, and sometimes that means reshaping the session. Occasionally it means recommending somebody else.
Send the audience and what your board faces. I reply within a day.
Enquire or email rahim@thesuperskills.com
Part of speaking across Asia. See also Singapore and Shanghai. The parent page for all of this is AI keynote speaker. Browse every topic, audience and region, or take the speaker pack to whoever is running the day. Every engagement delivered so far, with the dates checkable at each organiser, is at the speaking record.
Not every brief is a talk. A board that needs to settle which decisions a machine may make wants a board briefing, a review or a standing advisor, and the five formats are set out side by side with what each one is for.
No enquiry today, or not yet the right time? The weekly letter is the low-commitment version of the same argument. Every week, an essay and ten links to broaden your view of the world. Read by 25,000 people, every week since 2017. Free, and one click to stop.
Opens Substack to confirm. No pitch in it, unsubscribe in one click, and nobody follows up because you read something.
Running an event, or responsible for how AI arrives in your organisation? Keynotes · Advisory · Boards · Enquire