Home / Keynotes / Europe / Copenhagen
Available in CopenhagenDenmark automated harder than any country in the European Union and legislated hardest to keep a human deciding. Since 2018 a civil servant has had to answer, in writing, whether professional discretion has been preserved before Parliament votes on a bill. Keynotes for boards, conferences and leadership teams in Copenhagen.
Rahim Hirji is available for in-person AI keynotes in Copenhagen, Denmark, and for online sessions worldwide. He is a London-based keynote speaker specialising in AI and human judgement, and the author of SuperSkills (Kogan Page, 2026). He founded the skills platform EtonX, later acquired by Eton College, and led Quizlet’s international growth across more than 60 countries.
The 2018 digital-ready legislation guidance, and Eurostat 2025Read at the issuing body’s own page, and quoted in full below.
Watch the showreel · 2 minutes
A feel for the room before you put me in front of yours.
SuperSkills is endorsed by Karim Lakhani (Harvard Business School), Alnoor Bhimani (London School of Economics), David Rowan (founding editor, WIRED UK), Sherry Coutu CBE and ten others. Rahim has spoken to leadership teams at Google, Barclays, Kaplan, BPP University and Next 15. Published by Kogan Page, part of Hachette UK.
What organisers say
“A standout highlight was an inspiring session with Rahim Hirji exploring SuperSkills and Human Judgement. As AI transforms daily workflows, the real differentiator isn't just algorithmic speed, it is intentional human design, critical judgement, empathy, and ethical stewardship. Technology accelerates the how, but human judgement defines the why.”
“We brought Rahim in to speak to our teams in the Corporate Bank about what AI actually changes for the people doing the work. He handled a demanding room and left them with something they could act on rather than only something to think about.”
On the book
“A powerful and practical 'operating system' for career survival in the AI era, and a timely and optimistic reminder that human judgment is the superpower that will save us.”
Every keynote is tailored after a briefing call, and the larger engagements start before the day rather than on it: a diagnostic of the client's own people, so the room hears its own evidence rather than somebody else's. What the room leaves with is written down.
What that has looked like: about 1,500 people joining a session run hybrid from central London at short notice, for a technology business changing AI tools faster than its people could absorb, which became executive coaching for the transformation lead; and an agency business convening Asia, Asia-Pacific, EMEA and North America into one event, where the work was naming the recurring situations nobody had vocabulary for, and the company took that wording into its strategy.
Six of the seven engagements published on this site produced further work after the session rather than at it. The seven are set out in full at case studies, each with a line saying what it does not show.
How to read these examples. They are published to show how the work is put together, not as a client list for Copenhagen. Most engagements are covered by confidentiality and are described without naming anyone; where a client is named anywhere on this site, it is with their agreement.
The Agency for Digital Government issued guidance on digital-ready legislation in July 2018, still in force, and mandatory for every government bill since 1 July 2018. Its third principle carries a checklist question, unlike anything in the other European instruments reviewed for this page: Er det sikret, at det fagprofessionelle skøn er opretholdt i tilfælde, hvor hensynet til borgernes retssikkerhed taler herfor?
Has it been ensured that professional discretion has been preserved in cases where regard for citizens’ legal certainty so requires. A question about human judgement, in writing, answered by a named official, before a vote.
The same document says objective rules should be used only where it makes sense and where professional discretion is not needed, and it puts a residual duty on the authority to ensure that discretion continues to be exercised. The 2018 wording was advisory. The ministry of justice’s current legislative-quality guidance has since hardened it: new legislation shall be digital-ready.
For a Danish board that is a useful mirror. The state has a compulsory checkpoint on whether judgement survives a change of process. Almost no company has one, which is the gap described at what board oversight of AI looks like.

On Eurostat’s 2025 figures Denmark is first in the European Union on enterprise AI use at 42 per cent, against an EU average of about 20 and against 5.2 per cent in Romania. It also posted the largest year-on-year rise in the Union. Statistics Denmark measured the earlier steps of the same climb, from 15 per cent in 2023 to 28 per cent in 2024.
One caution belongs with those numbers, because it is the sort of thing that gets left out. The 2025 collection added image, video and audio generation as a category that was not there before, so the series has a break in it and the climb is not purely organic. A speaker quoting 15, 28 and 42 as a clean curve is quoting three different questions.
On people rather than firms, Denmark is highest in the Union too, with just under half of individuals reporting generative AI use. Statistics Denmark also found that 70 per cent of AI-using enterprises reported more efficient workflows, which is the finding that makes the argument harder rather than easier: the efficiency is real. It is what makes the drift invisible.
The Agency for Digital Government is Denmark’s national coordinating supervisory authority for the AI Act, and on its own website it says that it remains unresolved precisely who will supervise the different areas within high-risk AI.
The most AI-adopting country in the European Union, saying in public that the supervision model is unfinished. That is not an embarrassment to be avoided on stage. It is the exact shape of the argument: capability arrives first, at speed, and the machinery for checking it is assembled afterwards, by people who were not in the room when the capability arrived.
Denmark has also required large companies to publish a data ethics statement in their annual report since 2021, which is a disclosure duty rather than a competence duty. The difference between the two is at what is meaningful human oversight.
Boards and executive committees, public sector and municipal leadership, financial services and pensions, life sciences, shipping and logistics, and the conference circuit around TechBBQ and Digital Tech Summit. Danish audiences are further into adoption than most rooms in Europe, so the version of this talk that lands there is the one about what has already happened rather than what might.
He is the wrong choice for a tools demonstration, a vendor pitch or a technical AI briefing, and for any brief that needs an optimistic message with the difficult part removed. If that is the brief, the guide to choosing an AI keynote speaker names four other kinds of speaker and when to pick each.
Is professional discretion preserved? Since 2018 a Danish civil servant has had to answer that in writing before Parliament votes on a new law. Denmark also adopts AI faster than any other EU country, so companies here need the same answer, and soon. My book SuperSkills, endorsed by Karim Lakhani of Harvard Business School and Alnoor Bhimani of the LSE, gives a method for reaching it. Your organisation ends the session with its written answer, signed by someone with the authority to keep it true. Bring people who will argue.
About 25,000 people read Box of Amazing, the free letter Rahim has written weekly since 2017. Danish clients get the same reading in his keynotes and advice. Keynotes · Advisory · Box of Amazing
Keynotes run 30 to 90 minutes, in person or virtual. A 30-minute main-stage version of each talk is available for conferences, and the full talk runs 45 to 60 minutes. The sector examples change for the room; the argument does not. All three, with the showreel, are at keynotes, and the programme copy is at the speaker pack.
Drift versus Design is built from your room. Your audience answers five anonymous questions beforehand, their answers shape the talk, and afterwards you get a one-page readout with the three decisions to look at first.
Also speaking nearby: Oslo · Helsinki · Amsterdam.
Drift versus Design: why most organisations hand their judgement to AI without deciding to, and how to design your way through instead.
Danish ministries answer in writing whether discretion survives a new law. A leadership team can ask the same of itself: which choices have passed to software, and which would it now keep?
We Are Superheroes: AI is the suit. The human decides.
Denmark adopted AI faster than any other EU country, so most staff already wear the suit. The talk asks what matters next: who inside the suit is still making the decisions.
WTH (What the Human): a live test of a board's own judgement.
The board drafts its version of the 2018 guidance before its next vote on a system: where professional judgement sits, and who checks it still does. Then the room argues with the draft.
Two practical warnings before anything else, because both cost time. The domain forumcopenhagen.dk has lapsed and now redirects to a gambling affiliate site; the venue is live and its actual address is forumcph.dk. And tivolicongresscenter.dk is dead and does not redirect; the Tivoli conference facilities sit under the hotel.
The Copenhagen calendar, from organisers’ own pages. Digital Tech Summit runs 4 and 5 November 2026 at Øksnehallen, with the organiser stating more than 3,500 leaders and specialists plus 1,500 students. TechBBQ moved to the Bella Center in 2025 and drew more than 10,000 attendees there; its 2026 edition ran on 26 and 27 August, and 2027 dates are not yet firmly stated. Nordic Fintech Week runs from 21 September 2026. Dansk Erhvervs Årsdag gathered 1,700 business leaders at the Bella Center in September 2026, and is the strongest single corporate keynote platform in the city.
One correction for anyone building a Danish list from search results: Digitaliseringsmessen is in Odense, not Copenhagen.
Rahim Hirji is a London-based keynote speaker on AI, work and human judgement and the author of SuperSkills (Kogan Page, 2026). He travels to Copenhagen for boards, executive teams, conferences and leadership offsites, and delivers in English. The Copenhagen version of the keynote works from Denmark's own instruments: the 2018 digital-ready legislation guidance, the Agency for Digital Government's current position on AI Act supervision, and Eurostat's measurement of Danish adoption. The research behind the talk is published in full: 547 graded studies drawn from work across more than 200 organisations in over 30 countries, each with what it does and does not prove.
On Eurostat's 2025 reference year, yes: 42 per cent of Danish enterprises with ten or more employees used AI, against an EU average of about 20 per cent, and Denmark posted the largest year-on-year rise in the Union. One caveat belongs with it. The 2025 collection added image, video and audio generation as a category, so the series from 15 per cent in 2023 and 28 per cent in 2024 has a break in it and should not be presented as a clean curve.
The Agency for Digital Government's guidance on digital-ready legislation, in force since 1 July 2018 and still current, requires that every government bill be assessed against seven principles. The third carries a written question asking whether it has been ensured that professional discretion is preserved in cases where regard for citizens' legal certainty so requires. It is a legislated checkpoint for human judgement, answered before Parliament votes, and no other EU member state reviewed for this page has an equivalent.
Three to six months ahead for an in-person date in Copenhagen. Shorter is often possible for a virtual session, and sometimes in person where the diary is free and the talk already exists in the form you need. Ask earlier rather than later. There is one of him, he carries advisory clients and other commitments alongside the speaking, so not every date can be taken.
Most conference keynotes come in around £10,000. What moves it: the time I commit, travel, how full the diary is that month, and how far the talk is built for your room. What moves the number is set out at what an AI keynote speaker costs. Tell us the room, the date, the audience and what you need them to do differently, and you will get a number within 24 hours. Schools, universities and charities are quoted differently. On travel there is one rule: outside London you book it and you pay it, because your rates are better than his and nobody is out of pocket waiting on a reimbursement. From London to Copenhagen is under three hours, so a coach fare and arrival the night before. One night is usually enough, and a same-day return is possible for an afternoon slot if that suits the budget better. A London booking carries no travel, accommodation or expenses at all.
When the decision has already been made and the session exists to announce it. When the audience has no authority over their own work, because the talk asks them to decide which repetitions are worth keeping. When the slot runs under thirty minutes, because the turn needs setting up. And when the session follows a vendor pitch, since order matters more than programmes usually assume. Where the conditions are wrong we will say so, and sometimes that means reshaping the session. Occasionally it means recommending somebody else.
Say when the room meets and what it has to settle, and we can book a short call to shape the brief.
Enquire or email rahim@thesuperskills.com
Part of speaking across Europe, alongside Helsinki and London. The parent page for all of this is AI keynote speaker. Browse every topic, audience and region, or take the speaker pack to whoever is running the day. Every engagement delivered so far, with the dates checkable at each organiser, is at the speaking record.
Not every brief is a talk. A board that needs to settle which decisions a machine may make wants a board briefing, a review or a standing advisor, and the five formats are set out side by side with what each one is for.
No enquiry today, or not yet the right time? The weekly letter is the low-commitment version of the same argument. Every week, an essay and ten links to broaden your view of the world. Read by 25,000 people, every week since 2017. Free, and one click to stop.
Opens Substack to confirm. No pitch in it, unsubscribe in one click, and nobody follows up because you read something.
Running an event, or responsible for how AI arrives in your organisation? Keynotes · Advisory · Boards · Enquire